多参数超声联合穿刺诊断三阴性乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移

胡小丽; 廖春雁; 吴大浪; 刘  婵; 陈  霞

doi:10.12117/jccmi.2020.05.005

中国临床医学影像杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (5) : 325-329. DOI: 10.12117/jccmi.2020.05.005

乳腺影像学

多参数超声联合穿刺诊断三阴性乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移

胡小丽，廖春雁，吴大浪，刘婵，陈霞

作者信息 +

Diagnosis of axillary lymph node metastasis in triple-negative breast cancer by multi-parameter ultrasound combined with biopsy

HU Xiao-li, LIAO Chun-yan, WU Da-lang, LIU Chan, CHEN Xia

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

目的：探索常规超声、剪切波弹性成像（SWE）和超声引导下细针穿刺（FNA）联合应用在三阴性乳腺癌（TNBC）腋窝淋巴结转移术前评估中的价值。方法：选择贵州医科大学附属医院经病理证实的TNBC患者作为研究对象。其中转移组48例，反应组57例。对检出的淋巴结进行常规超声及SWE检查，比较转移组与反应组超声及SWE多参数指标。对可疑的腋窝淋巴结进行超声引导下FNA细胞学检查，评价常规超声、SWE、FNA及三者联合对TNBC腋窝淋巴结的诊断效能。结果：转移组淋巴结长径（L）/短径（S）比值（L/S）≤2、形态不规则、淋巴门缺失以及未见淋巴门型血流分布的患者比例多于反应组，杨氏模量（YM）平均值高于反应组，差异均具有统计学意义（均P＜0.05）。SWE对TNBC转移性腋窝淋巴结的诊断敏感性（87.50%）高于常规超声（79.17%）及FNA（75.00%）；而FNA诊断TNBC转移性腋窝淋巴结的特异性（94.74%）高于SWE（82.46%）和常规超声（70.18%）。三者联合诊断拟合方程为Logit（P）=-5.301+5.860×FNA阳性+2.259×L/S≤2+1.326×形态不规则+4.081×淋巴门缺失+2.729×未见淋巴门型血流+0.121×YM平均值。三者联合的敏感性为97.92%，高于常规超声、SWE及FNA，特异性为87.72%，稍低于FNA，但明显高于常规超声及SWE。结论：常规超声、SWE与腋窝淋巴结FNA联合提高了诊断TNBC腋窝淋巴结转移的准确性。

Abstract

Objective: To explore the value of conventional ultrasound combined with shear wave elastography(SWE) and ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration(FNA) cytology in preoperative evaluation of axillary lymph node metastasis in triple-negative breast cancer(TNBC). Methods: Female patients pathologically confirmed to be TNBC in the Guizhou Medical University Affiliated Hospital were recruited as subjects. There were 48 cases in the metastatic group and 57 cases in the reaction group. The detected lymph nodes were subjected to conventional ultrasound and SWE examination, and the ultrasound and SWE multi-parameter indicators of the metastatic group and the reaction group were compared. Ultrasound-guided FNA cytology was performed on suspected axillary lymph nodes to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of conventional ultrasound, SWE, FNA, and the combination of the three in TNBC axillary lymph nodes. Results: The proportion of patients with metastatic lymph nodes in long to short dimension ratio(L/S)≤2, irregular morphology, missing lymphatic portal, and no lymphatic portal blood flow distribution was higher than that of the reaction group. The mean young’s module(YM) was higher than that of the reaction group, and the difference was statistically significant(both P<0.05). The sensitivity of SWE(87.50%) for the diagnosis of TNBC metastatic axillary lymph nodes was higher than that of conventional ultrasound(79.17%) and FNA(75.00%). The specificity of FNA(94.74%) for the diagnosis of TNBC metastatic axillary lymph nodes was higher than that of SWE(82.46%) and conventional ultrasound(70.18%). The combined fitting equation of conventional ultrasound, SWE and FNA was Logit(P)=-5.301 +5.860×positive FNA+2.259×L/S≤2+1.326×irregular morphology+4.081×missing lymphatic portal+2.729×no lymphatic portal blood flow+0.121×YM average. The sensitivity of the combination was 97.92%, which was higher than that of conventional ultrasound, SWE and FNA respectively. The specificity was 87.72%, which was slightly lower than FNA, but significantly higher than conventional ultrasound and SWE. Conclusion: Conventional ultrasound combined with elastography and ultrasound-guided FNA could improve the accuracy in diagnosis of metastatic axillary lymph node of TNBC.

导出引用

胡小丽，廖春雁，吴大浪，刘婵，陈霞. 多参数超声联合穿刺诊断三阴性乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志. 2020, 31(5): 325-329 https://doi.org/10.12117/jccmi.2020.05.005

HU Xiao-li, LIAO Chun-yan, WU Da-lang, LIU Chan, CHEN Xia. Diagnosis of axillary lymph node metastasis in triple-negative breast cancer by multi-parameter ultrasound combined with biopsy[J]. Journal of China Clinic Medical Imaging. 2020, 31(5): 325-329 https://doi.org/10.12117/jccmi.2020.05.005

中图分类号： Ｒ737.9 Ｒ445.1

参考文献

[1]丁志颖，黄敏，郭建锋. 超声诊断三阴性乳腺癌的研究进展[J]. 中国医学影像技术，2017，33（1）：141-144.
[2]敖冬歌，尹洪磊，赵斌. 三阴性浸润性乳腺导管癌不同年龄组腋窝淋巴结转移情况及预后分析[J]. 中华内分泌外科杂志，2019，13（1）：59-62.
[3]邱炎平，李一鹏，林文. 前哨淋巴结活检在乳腺癌根治术腋窝淋巴结清扫中的应用价值[J]. 中国当代医药，2017，24（2）：51-53.
[4]常婉英，贾宛儒，史俊妮，等. 超声弹性成像联合常规超声在乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移诊断中的价值[J]. 肿瘤影像学，2019，28（1）：8-12.
[5]阮雅君，潘登，祝杭燕，等. 超声引导下细针穿刺对乳腺癌及腋下淋巴结转移的诊断价值[J]. 中国慢性病预防与控制，2018，26（10）：47-50.
[6]郭碧萍，李艳宁，徐丽芳，等. 超声弹性成像联合常规超声评分对乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移的诊断价值[J]. 广西医科大学学报，2017，34（6）：832-834.
[7]李向珍，敖萍萍. 超声弹性成像在甲状腺癌诊断中的应用价值[J]. 医学综述，2015，21（14）：2672-2673.
[8]韩洁莹，冯嘉贤，饶思旌，等. 超声弹性成像、钼靶X线在乳腺肿块良恶性鉴别诊断中的价值[J]. 吉林医学，2017，38（5）：814-817.
[9]Dent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard KI, et al. Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Clinical Features and Patterns of Recurrence[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2007, 13(15): 4429-4434.
[10]关印，徐兵河. 三阴性乳腺癌的临床病理特征及预后分析[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志，2008，30（3）：196-199.
[11]王婷，马云. 淋巴结比例对有腋窝淋巴结转移的三阴性乳腺癌患者预后的价值[J]. 中国现代医生，2012，50（5）：82-84.
[12]姚岚，张殿龙，孟佳佳，等. 超声、增强CT与增强MRI在乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移中的诊断价值比较[J]. 中国现代医生，2019，57（7）：100-104；175.
[13]Ewing DE, Layfield LJ, Joshi CL, et al. Determinants of False-Negative Fine-Needle Aspirates of Axillary Lymph Nodes in Women with Breast Cancer: Lymph Node Size, Cortical Thickness and Hilar Fat Retention[J]. Acta Cytologica, 2015, 59(4): 311-314.
[14]赵巧玲，阮骊韬，张华，等. 实时组织弹性成像对乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移的诊断价值评估[J]. 西安交通大学学报：医学版，2013，34（5）：656-658.
[15]Choi YJ, Lee JH, Lim HK, et al. Quantitative Shear Wave Elastography in the Evaluation of Metastatic Cervical Lymph Nodes[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2013, 39(6): 935-940.
[16]Esen G, Gurses B, Yilmaz MH, et al. Gray scale and power Doppler US in the preoperative evaluation of axillary metastases in breast cancer patients with no palpable lymph nodes[J]. Eur Radiol, 2005, 15(6): 1215-1223.
[17]纪岩磊，韩真，马恒敏，等. 超声弹性成像对乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结诊断价值的探讨[J]. 中华肿瘤防治杂志，2016，23（16）：1081-1084.
[18]周世崇，乐坚，胡娜，等. 超声引导细针穿刺对乳腺癌腋下淋巴结转移的诊断价值[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志，2017，26（6）：527-530.
[19]任艳，刘晓晖. 超声弹性成像联合二维超声评分法对乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移状态的诊断价值[J]. 实用临床医药杂志，2019，23（2）：10-13.
[20]程慧芳，王学梅，李银燕，等. 实时剪切波弹性成像评价颈部及腋窝淋巴结硬度[J]. 中国医学影像技术，2015，31（3）：363-366.
[21]Tourasse C, Dénier JF, Awada A, et al. Elastography in the assessment of sentinel lymph nodes prior to dissection[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2012, 81(11): 3154-3159.