Dynamic observation of aortic restenosis in rabbits by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and common ultrasonography

LIU Qiu-ying;REN Wei-dong;TANG Bo

Journal of China Clinic Medical Imaging ›› 2008, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (11) : 779-781.

Journal of China Clinic Medical Imaging ›› 2008, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (11) : 779-781.
论著

Dynamic observation of aortic restenosis in rabbits by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and common ultrasonography

  • LIU Qiu-ying1, REN Wei-dong1, TANG Bo2
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective: To compare the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography(CEUS) and common ultrasonography in follow-up of aortic restenosis in rabbits after balloon injury and to find a new method to observe restenosis. Methods: Thirty rabbits underwent CEUS and common ultrasonography instantly, on the 3rd, 7th, 14th, 21th and 28th days after abdominal aorta was injuried by balloon. Diameter and systolic peak velocity(PSV) of the injured segment and normal segment 2cm proximal to the abnormality were measured after injury and restenosis rate was calculated. Results: ①The diameter of the lesion increased instantly after injury and decreased on the 7th day. The restenosis rate reached the peak on the 14th day, and it didn’t change afterwards. ②Light restenosis was detected by CEUS on the 7th day, earlier than common ultrasonography. Stenosis rate measured with CEUS was well related with pathology, and the correlation coefficient of it was higher than that of common ultrasonography.③CEUS displayed turbulence more clearly than color Doppler. Conclusion: CEUS could detect restenosis early and accurately. Restenosis rate measured with CEUS is more accurate than common ultrasonography and it can do great help in follow-up of restenosis.

Key words

Vascular diseases / Constriction / pathologic

Cite this article

Download Citations
LIU Qiu-ying;REN Wei-dong;TANG Bo. Dynamic observation of aortic restenosis in rabbits by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and common ultrasonography[J]. Journal of China Clinic Medical Imaging. 2008, 19(11): 779-781

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/