Evaluation of right ventricular systolic function in children with ventricular septal defect by speckle tracking imaging

LI Sha; ZHANG Li-min; MA Chun-yan; YANG Jun

Journal of China Clinic Medical Imaging ›› 2014, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (10) : 712-714.

论著

Evaluation of right ventricular systolic function in children with ventricular septal defect by speckle tracking imaging

LI Sha, ZHANG Li-min, MA Chun-yan, YANG Jun

Author information +

History +

Abstract

Objective: To explore the value of two-dimensional speckle tracking imaging(2D-STI) strain in evaluating right ventricular systolic function in children with ventricular septal defect(VSD). Methods: Forty simple VSD patients and thirty healthy children were included in this study. According to VSD, the patients were divided into two groups: VSD without pulmonary hypertension(PH) group and VSD with PH group. Conventional parameters of right ventricular were measured. Right ventricular peak strain, systolic strain rate application with 2D-STI were measured. Results: Compared with control group and VSD without PH group, right ventricular end-diastolic area and end systolic area increased in VSD with PH group(P<0.05), and the difference was statistically significant. Peak strain and peak strain rate in each section and the globle right ventricle decreased, the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Compared with control group, it showed no signigicant differences in VSD without PH group(P>0.05). Conclusions: The VSD with PH has decreased right ventricular systolic function. To evaluate right ventricular systolic function of VSD in children, 2D-STI parameters of strain and strain rate are of great significance.

Key words

Heart septal defects / ventricular / Echocardiography / Doppler / color

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

LI Sha;ZHANG Li-min;MA Chun-yan;YANG Jun. Evaluation of right ventricular systolic function in children with ventricular septal defect by speckle tracking imaging[J]. Journal of China Clinic Medical Imaging. 2014, 25(10): 712-714