Comparative study among MRI features and risk stratification in rectal stromal tumor

SUN Chao1, LIU Jun2, LI Peng2, XU Liang2

Journal of China Clinic Medical Imaging ›› 2017, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (3) : 197-200.

Journal of China Clinic Medical Imaging ›› 2017, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (3) : 197-200.

Comparative study among MRI features and risk stratification in rectal stromal tumor

  • SUN Chao1, LIU Jun2, LI Peng2, XU Liang2
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective: To summarize MRI features and investigate the relationship between MRI manifestations and risk stratification in rectal stromal tumor. Methods: Appearances of MRI in 18 cases of rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors diagnosed by surgery and pathology between 2012 and 2016 were analyzed retrospectively, assessing tumor risk stratification. Results: Pathological classification was as following: among them, 72%(13/18) were high-risk, 22%(4/18) were intermediated-risk,  6%(1/18) were low-risk. MRI findings were graded for rectal stromal tumors by two radiologists. There was a significant correlation between certain MRI features(tumor size, boundary and uniformity of signal) and tumor risk stratification(P<0.05). However, tumor growth pattern and morphous were found to have no statistical significance for high-risk malignant rectal stromal tumor. Conclusion: Rectal stromal tumor has some specific MRI findings which could have important significances for qualitative diagnosis, assessing tumor risk stratification and differential diagnosis.

Key words

Rectal neoplasms / Magnetic resonance imaging

Cite this article

Download Citations
SUN Chao1, LIU Jun2, LI Peng2, XU Liang2. Comparative study among MRI features and risk stratification in rectal stromal tumor[J]. Journal of China Clinic Medical Imaging. 2017, 28(3): 197-200

References

[1]Valsangkar N, Sehdev A, Misra S, et al. Current management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: surgery, current biomarkers, mutations, and therapy[J]. Surgery, 2015, 158(5): 1149-1164.
[2]Xiao CC, Zhang S, Wang MH, et al. Clinicopathological features and prognostic factors of rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2013, 17(4): 793-798.
[3]Yoon KJ, Kim NK, Lee KY, et al. Efficacy of imatinib mesylate neoadjuvant treatment for a locally advanced rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor[J]. J Kor Soc Coloproctol, 2011, 27(3): 147-152.
[4]Dong C, Jun-Hui C, Xiao-Jun Y, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the rectum: clinical, pathologic, immunohistochemical characteristics and prognostic analysis[J]. Scand J Gastroenterol, 2007, 42(10): 1221-1229.
[5]Jiang ZX, Zhang SJ, Peng WJ, et al. Rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: imaging features with clinical and pathological correlation[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2013, 19(20): 3108-3116.
[6]中国CSCO胃肠间质瘤专家委员会. 中国胃肠间质瘤诊断治疗专家共识(2011年版)[J]. 临床肿瘤学杂志,2011,15(9):836-844.
[7]Jakhetiya A, Garg PK, Prakash G, et al. Targeted therapy of gastrointestinal stromal tumors[J]. World J Gastrointest Surg, 2016, 8(5): 345-352.
[8]王庭红. MRI对直肠间质瘤的术前诊断价值[J]. 中国CT和MRI杂志,2014,12(1):75-78.
[9]Purysko AS, Coppa CP, Kalady MF, et al. Benign and malignant tumors of the rectum and perirectal region[J]. Abdom Imaging, 2014, 39(4): 824-852.
[10]Amato A. Colorectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor[J]. Tech Coloproctol, 2010, 14(Suppl 1): S91-S95.
[11]Hou YY, Zhou Y, Lu SH, et al. Imatinib mesylate neoadjuvant treatment for rectal malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumor[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2009, 15(15): 1910-1913.

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/