四肢骨影像学类死骨征象的临床意义分析

张 源,陈海松,冯卫华,周锐志

中国临床医学影像杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (12) : 884-888.

中国临床医学影像杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (12) : 884-888. DOI: 10.12117/jccmi.2018.12.012
肌肉骨骼影像学

四肢骨影像学类死骨征象的临床意义分析

  • 张 源,陈海松,冯卫华,周锐志
作者信息 +

The clinical significance of the sequestrum sign in limb bone imaging

  • ZHANG Yuan, CHEN Hai-song, FENG Wei-hua, ZHOU Rui-zhi
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的:研究影像学类死骨征象在四肢骨不同疾病中的出现率。方法:回顾分析四肢骨病变并有骨质破坏患者的资料,共253名患者13个病种,诊断均经病理或临床随访证实,均经CT检查,163例经平片检查,144例经MRI检查,三种检查齐全的共66例。在CT图像上观察病灶内此征象的出现情况,统计出现此征象的病种及出现率,用χ2检验进行统计分析。结果:92.3%(12/13)的病种和43.1%(109/253)的病例出现此征象。不同病种其出现率不同,骨髓炎为52.9%(27/51),骨结核为70.0%(7/10),骨转移瘤为47.1%(48/102),骨纤维异常增殖症为32.1%(9/28),骨巨细胞瘤为22.2%(6/27),骨结核中类死骨征象出现率最高(χ2=11.532,P<0.05),其次为骨髓炎和骨转移瘤。亦可出现于其他疾病中,Langerhans组织细胞增生症3例(3/8),淋巴瘤1例(1/6),恶性纤维组织细胞瘤2例(2/5),动脉瘤样骨囊肿3例(3/5),骨化性纤维瘤1例(1/8),骨血管肉瘤1例(1/1),纤维肉瘤1例(1/1),原始神经外胚层肿瘤0例(0/1)。结论:绝大多数有骨质破坏的四肢骨良恶性疾病中可不同比例的出现类死骨征象,在骨结核中出现率最高,其次为骨髓炎和骨转移瘤。应结合其它征象具体分析做出定性诊断以避免误诊。

Abstract

Objective: To study the differences of the occurrence rate of “sequestrum” sign in different diseases of extremity. Methods: Patients with limb bone diseases and bone destructive lesions in our hospital from 2008 to 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Two hundred and fifty-three patients with 13 types of diseases that proved by pathology or clinical follow-up were included in the observation. CT examination was performed in all cases, radiography in 163 cases, MRI in 144 cases, and all the three kinds of examination was performed in 66 cases. CT images were used to observe the occurrence of the “sequestrum” sign and to calculate the occurrence rate of the sign. χ2 test was used to perform statistical analysis. Results: “Sequestrum” sign appeared in 92.3%(12/13) of the disease types and in 43.1%(109/253) of all the cases. But occurrence rate of “sequestrum” sign differed in different types of the disease, osteomyelitis 52.9%(27/51), skeletal tuberculosis 70.0%(7/10), metastatic carcinoma 47.1%(48/102), fibrous dysplasia 32.1%(9/28), and giant cell tumor of bone 22.2%(6/27). The occurrence rate was the highest in bone tuberculosis(χ2=11.532, P<0.05), followed by osteomyelitis and bone metastases. Other types with less cases also showed “sequestrum” sign, including 3 cases of Langerhans cell histiocytosis(3/8), 1 case of primary lymphoma of bone(1/6), 2 cases of malignant fibrous tumors(2/5), 3 cases of aneurysmal bone cyst(3/5), 1 case of osteofibrous dysplasia(1/8), 1 case of angiosarcoma of bone(1/1), and 1 case of fibrosarcoma of bone(1/1). The sign was not found in the only one case of primitive neuroectodermal tumor(PNET)(0/1). Conclusion: “Sequestrum” sign can be seen in vast majority of limb bone disease of benign and malignant bone destructive lesions, but it is seen in skeletal tuberculosis most commonly, followed by osteomyelitis and bone metastases. We should combine this sign with other signs to make qualitative diagnosis and avoid misdiagnosis.

关键词

骨疾病 / 体层摄影术 / X线计算机 / 磁共振成像

Key words

Bone diseases / Tomography, X-ray computed / Magnetic resonance imaging

引用本文

导出引用
张 源,陈海松,冯卫华,周锐志. 四肢骨影像学类死骨征象的临床意义分析[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志. 2018, 29(12): 884-888 https://doi.org/10.12117/jccmi.2018.12.012
ZHANG Yuan, CHEN Hai-song, FENG Wei-hua, ZHOU Rui-zhi. The clinical significance of the sequestrum sign in limb bone imaging[J]. Journal of China Clinic Medical Imaging. 2018, 29(12): 884-888 https://doi.org/10.12117/jccmi.2018.12.012
中图分类号: R681    R814.42    R445.2   

参考文献

[1]Jennin F, Bousson V, Parlier C, et al. Bony sequestrum: a radiologic review[J]. Skeletal Radiol, 2011, 40(8): 963-975. [2]Liu PT, Chivers FS, Roberts CC, et al. Imaging of osteoid osteoma with dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging[J]. Radiology, 2003, 227(3): 691-700. [3]Resnick D. Tumors and tumor-like lesions of bone: imaging and pathology of specific lesions[M]//Diagnosis of bone and joint disorders. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2002: 3763-4128. [4]Kroon HM, Schurmans J. Osteoblastoma: clinical and radiologic findings in 98 new cases[J]. Radiology, 1990, 175(3): 783-790. [5]Yamaguchi T, Dorfman HD. Radiographic and histologic patterns of calcification in chondromyxoid fibroma[J]. Skeletal Radiol, 1998, 27(10): 559-564. [6]Campbell RS, Grainger AJ, Mangham DC, et al. Intraosseous lipoma: report of 35 new cases and a review of the literature[J]. Skeletal Radiol, 2003, 32(4): 209-222. [7]Abdelwahab IF, Hermann G, Klein MJ, et al. Fibromyxoma of bone[J]. Skeletal Radiol, 1991, 20(2): 95-98. [8]De Backer AI, Mortele KJ, Vanhoenacker FM, et al. Imaging of extraspinal musculoskeletal tuberculosis[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2006, 57(1): 119-130. [9]Shanley DJ. Tuberculosis of the spine: imaging features[J]. AJR, 1995, 164(3): 659-664. [10]Ousehal A, Adil A, Abdelouafi A, et al. Centrosomatic spinal tuberculosis: radiographic features in 10 cases[J]. J Neuroradiol, 2000, 27(4): 247-252. [11]Resnick D. Osteomyelitis, septic arthritis, and soft-tissue infection[M]//Diagnosis of bone and joint disorders. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2002: 2372-2550. [12]Rosen IW, Nadel HI. Button sequestrum of the skull[J]. Radiology, 1969, 92(5): 969-971. [13]Hindman BW, Thomas RD, Young LW, et al. Langerhans cell histiocytosis: unusual skeletal manifestations observed in thirty-four cases[J]. Skeletal Radiol, 1998, 27(4): 177-181. [14]Pratt AD, Felson B, Wiot JF, et al. Sequestrum formation in fibrous dysplasia[J]. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med, 1969, 106(1): 162-165. [15]Mulligan ME, Mcrae GA, Murphey MD. Imaging features of primary lymphoma of bone[J]. AJR, 2013, 173(6): 1691-1697. [16]Mulligan ME, Kransdorf MJ. Sequestra in primary lymphoma of bone: prevalence and radiologic features[J]. AJR, 1993, 160(6): 1245-1248. [17]Helms CA, Jeffrey RB, Wing VW. Computed tomography and plain film appearance of a bony sequestration: significance and differential diagnosis[J]. Skeletal Radiol, 1987, 16(2): 117-120. [18]Prasad A, Manchanda S, Sachdev N, et al. Imaging features of pediatric musculoskeletal tuberculosis[J]. Pediatr Radiol, 2012, 42(10): 1235-1249. [19]De Backer AI, Vanhoenacker FM, Sanghvi DA. Imaging features of extraaxial musculoskeletal tuberculosis[J]. Indian J Radiol Imaging, 2009, 19(3): 176-186. [20]Teo HE, Peh WC. Skeletal tuberculosis in children[J]. Pediatr Radiol, 2004, 34(11): 853-860. [21]Burrill J, Williams CJ, Bain G, et al. Tuberculosis: a radiologic review[J]. Radiographics, 2007, 27(5): 1255-1273. [22]Maurer J, Lehmann-Beckow D, Vosshenrich R, et al. The place of computed tomography and magnetic resonance tomography in the diagnosis of bone sequestra[J]. Aktuelle Radiol, 1992, 2(6): 345-349. [23]Malcius D, Jonkus M, Kuprionis G, et al. The accuracy of different imaging techniques in diagnosis of acute hematogenous osteomyelitis[J]. Medicina(Kaunas), 2009, 45(8): 624-631. [24]Bires AM, Kerr B, George L. Osteomyelitis: an overview of imaging modalities[J]. Crit Care Nurs Q, 2015, 38(2): 154-164. [25]Gold RH, Hawkins RA, Katz RD. Bacterial osteomyelitis: findings on plain radiography, CT, MR, and scintigraphy[J]. AJR, 1991, 157(2): 365-370. [26]Unger E, Moldofsky P, Gatenby R, et al. Diagnosis of osteomyelitis by MR imaging[J]. AJR, 1988, 150(3): 605-610. [27]Chiappini E, Mastrangelo G, Lazzeri S. A case of acute osteomyelitis: an update on diagnosis and treatment[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2016, 13(6): E539. [28]Sartoris DJ, Resnick D, Guerra JJ. Vertebral venous channels: CT appearance and differential considerations[J]. Radiology, 1985, 155(3): 745-749. [29]Jhamb A, Mohanty S, Jhamb PA. Craniofacial fibrous dysplasia[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol, 2012, 16(3): 465-469. [30]Krasnokutsky MV. The button sequestrum sign[J]. Radiology, 2005, 236(3): 1026-1027. [31]Azouz EM, Saigal G, Rodriguez MM, et al. Langerhans’ cell histiocytosis: pathology, imaging and treatment of skeletal involvement[J]. Pediatr Radiol, 2005, 35(2): 103-115.

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/