摘要
目的:探讨双源CT大螺距(Flash)模式结合迭代重建(SAFIRE)在肺动脉成像中降低辐射剂量、优化图像质量的价值。方法:收集临床疑诊肺动脉栓塞需行CTPA检查、无检查禁忌症的患者60例,每组20例,分别接受不同的扫描模式;由两名放射科医师对图像用5分法进行主观评估,并测量7个肺血管CT值(HU±SD),并计算信号噪声比(SNR)和对比信噪比(CNR),比较辐射曝光参数,包括CT容积剂量指数(CTDIvol)和剂量长度乘积(DLP),并计算有效辐射剂量(ED);使用SPSS 16.0统计软件对数据进行分析。结果:所有图像均满足诊断要求,3种方案的影像质量在主观评价及客观测量(SNR、CNR)方面均无显著差异(P>0.05),而辐射剂量在不同方案之间不同,实验组2的辐射剂量(CTDvol和DLP)明显低于对照组及实验组1,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。结论:联合应用SAFIRE及Flash扫描模式行CTPA检查时可以在满足图像诊断要求前提下进一步降低辐射剂量。
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction technique based on raw data(SAFIRE) and high-pitch dual-source computed tomography on CT pulmonary angiography(CTPA) image quality meeting diagnostic requirements and radiation dose reduction. Methods: CTPA was preformed with three protococols: DSCT singal tube model(120 kV), high-pitch DSCT(100 kV), high-pitch DSCT(80 kV). For each protocol, 20 sex, age, and body-mass-index matched patients were identified. Retrospectively, two observers subjectively assessed image quality, measured CT attenuation(HU±SD) at seven central and peripheral levels, and calculated signal-to-noise-ratio(SNR) and contrast-to-noies-ratio(CNR). Radiation exposure parameters(CTDIvol and DLP) were compared. Using SPASS 16.0 statistical software to analyze data. Results: The three protocols did not significantly differ in image quality, neither by subjective, nor by objective measures(SNR, CNR). By contrast, radiation exposure differed between protocols: significant lower radiation was achieved by using high-pitch DSCT at 80 kV(P<0.001). Conclusion: Combined application of both SAFIRE and high-pitch DSCT can further reduce radiation dose on the base of image quality meeting diagnostic requirement.
关键词
肺栓塞 /
体层摄影术 /
X线计算机
Key words
Pulmonary embolism /
Tomography /
X-ray computed
董 霞;武志峰;鄂林宁;孟辉强;吴 山.
双源CT大螺距扫描联合迭代重建在肺动脉成像中的应用研究[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志. 2014, 25(6): 393-396
DONG Xia;WU Zhi-feng;E Lin-ning;MENG Hui-qiang;WU Shan.
The application of both SAFIRE and high-pitch dual-source computed tomography in pulmonary angiography[J]. Journal of China Clinic Medical Imaging. 2014, 25(6): 393-396
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}