摘要
目的：比较直肠超声引导下“6+X”针前列腺穿刺活检术与“X”针穿刺活检术在诊断前列腺癌方面的临床价值，从而分析系统6针有无必要。方法：对2012年1月—2013年8月与2013年8月—2014年12月两个阶段满足前列腺穿刺标准的可疑前列腺癌患者分别采用“X”针与“6+X”针穿刺活检术，并对资料进行回顾性统计分析。结果：按照穿刺方法不同分为A组和B组，A组66例患者有27例证实为前列腺癌，检出率为40.91%；B组55例患者有23例证实为前列腺癌，检出率为41.82%。结论：直肠超声引导下“6+X”针穿刺活检术与“X”针相比，并没有明显提高前列腺癌的检出率，因此，“6+X”针中的系统6针有望被取消。
Abstract
Objective: To compare the clinical value of 6+X cores and X cores prostate biopsy guided by transrectal ultrasonography in diagnosis of prostate cancer, to analyze the necessity of 6 cores. Methods: From January 2012 to August 2013 and from August 2013 to December 2014, patients who were suspected to suffer from prostate cancer and meted for prostate biopsy standards underwent X cores and 6+X cores prostate biopsy respectively, and analyzed the materials retrospectively. Results: All the patients were divided into group A and group B according to the puncture method, there were 27 cases proved to be prostate cancer in group A of 66 cases, detection rate was 40.91%; there were 23 cases proved to be prostate cancer in group B of 55 cases, detection rate was 41.82%. Conclusion: 6+X cores prostate biopsy guided by transrectal ultrasonography doesn’t improve the detection rate of prostate cancer significantly compared with X cores, so the 6 cores in 6+X cores is expected to be cancelled.
关键词
前列腺肿瘤 /
超声检查 /
彩色
Key words
Prostatic neoplasms /
Ultrasonography /
color
杨先悦;杨 晓.
超声引导下“6+X”针前列腺穿刺中6针的价值分析[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志. 2015, 26(9): 660-662
YANG Xian-yue;YANG Xiao.
Analyze the value of 6 cores in 6+X cores prostate biopsy guided by transrectal ultrasonography[J]. Journal of China Clinic Medical Imaging. 2015, 26(9): 660-662
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
