超声灰阶调节技术有助于判断甲状腺结节性质

张高松,郑 慧

中国临床医学影像杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (2) : 137-139.

中国临床医学影像杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (2) : 137-139.
影像技术学

超声灰阶调节技术有助于判断甲状腺结节性质

  • 张高松,郑  慧
作者信息 +

Gray scale adjustment technology is helpful to determine the nature of thyroid nodules

  • ZHANG Gao-song, ZHENG Hui
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的:探索一种能够让声阻抗系数接近的两组织界面能清晰显示的技术。方法:随机选择77例拟行甲状腺结节切除或穿刺的患者,每一例患者在术前超声检查时,先采用常规检查法得出TI-RADS诊断,并录入对照组,再采用常规结合灰阶调节技术法得出TI-RADS诊断,并录入干预组。将两组超声诊断绘制成表格,随访每一例患者的术后病理报告。结果:对比两组超声诊断与病理报告的符合情况,经统计学分析后可以认为常规结合灰阶调节技术法判断甲状腺结节性质较常规检查法在正确率、特异度和敏感度均有提高,差异有统计学意义。结论:超声局部灰阶调节技术能帮助超声医生判断甲状腺结节的性质。

Abstract

Objective: To explore a kind of technology, which can make the two tissue boundary whose acoustic impedance coefficient is very close to display clearly. Methods: Randomly selected 77 cases to resection of thyroid nodules or puncture. Firstly, the routine examination method to obtain TI-RADS diagnosis and entry control group, using conventional with gray scale adjustment technology to calculate TI-RADS diagnosis and entry intervention group, when each patient in preoperative ultrasonography. The two groups were drawn into the form of ultrasound diagnosis. The postoperative pathological report of each patient was followed up. Results: Compared two groups of ultrasound diagnosis and pathologic report compliance, that routine with gray scale adjustment technology is better than conventional examination in accuracy, specificity and sensitivity, the difference is statistically significant. Conclusion: Ultrasound local gray scale adjustment technology can help doctors to determine the nature of the thyroid nodule ultrasound.

关键词

甲状腺结节 / 超声检查

Key words

Thyroid nodule / Ultrasonography

引用本文

导出引用
张高松,郑 慧. 超声灰阶调节技术有助于判断甲状腺结节性质[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志. 2017, 28(2): 137-139
ZHANG Gao-song, ZHENG Hui. Gray scale adjustment technology is helpful to determine the nature of thyroid nodules[J]. Journal of China Clinic Medical Imaging. 2017, 28(2): 137-139
中图分类号: R736.1    R445.1   

参考文献

[1]吴燕萍,甘科红,周立峰,等. 甲状腺微小乳头状癌的超声表现及病理对照分析[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志,2016,27(4):236-238.
[2]候雪琴,范雪,杨凌菲,等. 甲状腺影像报告和数据系统分类诊断甲状腺良恶性结节的准确性[J]. 中国医学影像学杂志,2015,23(7):489-493.
[3]Khazendar S, Sayasneh A, Al-assam H, et al. Automated characterization of ultrasound images of ovarian tumours: the diagnostic accuracy of a support vector machine and image processing with a local binary pattern operator[J]. Facts Views Vis ObGyn, 2015, 7(1): 7-15.
[4]杨玉萍,徐晓红. 甲状腺超声TI-RADS分级诊断标准的研究进展[J]. 医学理论与实践,2014,27(18):2418-2419.
[5]程志颖,王少华,韩晶. 甲状腺癌的超声表现与病理分型的相关性[J]. 内蒙古医学杂志,2013,45(5):595-596.
[6]张东伟,杨维良,秦华东. 甲状腺许特莱氏细胞肿瘤的研究现状[J]. 临床外科杂志,2005,13(9):587-588.
[7]杨金燕,王玲,郑慧,等. 彩色多普勒超声对甲状腺癌的诊断价值分析[J]. 安徽医学,2014,35(11):1480-1482.
[8]王红阳,韩志江,包凌云. 超声对甲状腺滤泡性癌和腺瘤的鉴别诊断价值[J]. 中国超声医学杂志,2015,31(10):884-886.
[9]李小鹏,张红丽,何鑫,等. 甲状腺良恶性结节超声造影特征与病理微血管密度的相关性研究[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志,2015,26(9):631-634.

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/