摘要
目的:探索超声造影(CEUS)与常规超声(US)对单发无淋巴结转移甲状腺微小乳头状癌(PTMC)侵袭性的诊断价值。方法:选择经术后病理证实无颈部淋巴结转移的PTMC 92例作为研究对象。分为侵袭性组(13例)和非侵袭性组(79例)。比较两组患者结节的US及CEUS征象的差异,分析US、CEUS诊断单发无淋巴结转移PTMC侵袭性的准确性,并探索两种检查方式联合使用的诊断效能。结果:US征象中,侵袭性组边界不清比例、甲状腺被膜回声中断比例高于非侵袭性组(P<0.05)。CEUS征象中,侵袭性组增强后边界不清比例、边缘高增强比例以及增强范围形态改变比例高于非侵袭性组(P<0.05)。US诊断单发无淋巴结转移PTMC侵袭性的敏感性、特异性、准确性为46.15%、79.75%和75.00%,低于CEUS的84.62%、83.54%和83.70%。US联合CEUS诊断单发无淋巴结转移PTMC侵袭性的准确性最佳(AUC=0.929),其最佳诊断点为0.87,其敏感性为100%,特异性为87.74%,拟合方程为Logit(P)=-2.146+0.585×US边界不清+2.796×甲状腺被膜回声中断+0.659×增强后边界不清+3.521×增强后边缘高增强+5.541×增强范围形态改变。结论:US联合CEUS可更好地反映单发无淋巴结转移PTMC浸润生长及被膜侵犯的生物学特征,对判断其侵袭能力具有较高的应用价值。
Abstract
Objective: To explore the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound(CEUS) and two-dimensional ultrasound in the invasiveness of single papillary thyroid microcarcinoma(PTMC) without lymph node metastasis. Methods: A total of 92 patients with single PTMC but without lymph node metastasis confirmed by surgery pathology were recruited as subjects. They were divided into the invasive group(n=13) and non-invasive group(n=79). The differences of the characteristics in two-dimensional ultrasound and CEUS were compared between the two groups. The accuracy of ultrasound and CEUS in the diagnosis of single PTMC without lymph node metastasis was analyzed. The diagnostic efficacy of the combination of the two methods was explored. Results: In the ultrasound characteristics, the proportion of unclear boundary and the rupture of the thyroid capsule echo in the invasive group were higher than those in the non-invasive group(P<0.05). In the CEUS characteristics, the proportion of unclear boundary after enhancement, marginal high enhancement, and enhancement range morphological changes in the invasive group were higher than those in the non-invasive group(P<0.05). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of single PTMC without lymph node metastasis were 46.15%, 79.75%, and 75.00%, which were lower than CEUS(84.62%, 83.54%, and 83.70%). The combination of ultrasound and CEUS for the diagnosis of invasiveness of single PTMC without lymph node metastasis was the best(AUC=0.929). The best diagnostic point was 0.87. The sensitivity was 100%, and the specificity was 87.74%. The fitting equation was Logit(P)=-2.146+0.585×Two-dimensional ultrasound boundary unclear+2.796×thyroid capsule echo interruption+0.659×enhanced boundary unclear+3.521×enhanced edge height enhancement+5.541×enhanced range morphological change. Conclusion: CEUS combined with two-dimensional ultrasound can better indicate the invasive growth and capsule invasion of single PTMC without lymph node metastasis, and has high application value in judging its invasive ability.
关键词
甲状腺肿瘤 /
癌 /
乳头状 /
超声检查 /
多普勒 /
彩色
Key words
Thyroid neoplasms /
Carcinoma, papillary /
Ultrasonography, Doppler, color
江鑫辉,陈 捷,王媚瑜,周大为,忻 俊,郑 丽.
超声造影对无淋巴结转移甲状腺微小乳头状癌侵袭性的诊断价值[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志. 2020, 31(5): 320-324 https://doi.org/10.12117/jccmi.2020.05.004
JIANG Xin-hui, CHEN Jie, WANG Mei-yu, ZHOU Da-wei, XIN Jun, ZHENG Li.
Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the invasiveness of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma without lymph node metastasis[J]. Journal of China Clinic Medical Imaging. 2020, 31(5): 320-324 https://doi.org/10.12117/jccmi.2020.05.004
中图分类号:
R736.1
R730.261
R445.1
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1]许凡勇,张黎,夏进东. 无淋巴结转移甲状腺乳头状癌的CT误漏诊分析[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志,2018,29(6):391-394.
[2]中国抗癌协会甲状腺癌专业委员会(CATO). 甲状腺微小乳头状癌诊断与治疗中国专家共识(2016版). 中国肿瘤临床,2016,43(10):405-411.
[3]赵刚,陈喆,吴泽宇,等. 无淋巴结转移的甲状腺微小乳头状癌预后因素分析[J]. 实用医学杂志,2012,28(19):3248-3250.
[4]Park CH, Song CM, Ji YB, et al. Significance of the extracapsular spread of metastatic lymph nodes in papillary thyroid carcinoma [J]. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol, 2015, 8(3): 289-294.
[5]中华医学超声杂志(电子版)编辑委员会浅表器官学组. 甲状腺结节超声诊断规范[J]. 中华医学超声杂志:电子版,2017,14(4):241-244.
[6]Rago T, Vitti P, Chiovato L, et al. Role of conventional ultrasonography and color flow-doppler sonography in predicting malignancy in 'cold' thyroid nodules[J]. Eur J Endocrinol, 1998, 138(1): 41-46.
[7]张雅,邱国文,夏永康. 超声造影在术前预测甲状腺乳头状癌被膜外侵犯中的诊断价值[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展,2018,21(9):11-14.
[8]陈霰,徐丽伟,华娟,等. 超声造影在甲状腺微小乳头状癌诊断中的应用价值[J]. 中国超声医学杂志,2015,31(4):375-378.
[9]刘书宇,谷莹,韩志江,等. 超声在2.0~4.0 mm甲状腺良、恶性微小结节鉴别诊断中的价值[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志,2017,28(6):397-399.
[10]张颖,李建初,王亚红,等. 18 MHz高频线阵探头在判断甲状腺癌侵犯前方被膜中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志:电子版,2017,14(4):257-262.
[11]吴琼,姜玉新,房世保,等. 常规超声诊断困难的甲状腺结节的超声造影定性及定量研究[J]. 医学研究杂志,2016,45(5):42-46.
[12]崔秋丽,刘文英,李广涵. 甲状腺乳头状癌超声造影增强模式及与肿瘤侵袭性的关系探讨[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志,2015,24(7):580-583.
[13]姜月茗茗,许幼峰,陈立斌,等. 实时超声造影技术在甲状腺微小乳头状癌诊断中的应用研究[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志,2015,24(10):882-885.
[14]丁珂,崔秋丽,严昆,等. 常规超声与超声造影判断甲状腺乳头状癌被膜侵犯的应用价值[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志,2017,26(3):243-248.
[15]刘莹,周鸿,杨鹏,等. 甲状腺乳头状癌超声造影判断肿瘤侵袭能力的应用价值[J]. 西南国防医药,2017,27(8):847-850.
[16]刘颖娴. 联合常规超声及超声造影在甲状腺微小乳头状癌中的诊断价值[D]. 遵义医学院,2014.
基金
上海市宝山区科学技术委员会科技创新专项基金项目(17-E-14)。