超声造影结合定量分析法诊断甲状腺微小乳头状癌的临床价值

梁丽萍,任海波,郑艳芬,邬彩虹

中国临床医学影像杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4) : 253-256.

中国临床医学影像杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4) : 253-256. DOI: 10.12117/jccmi.2019.04.007
头颈部影像学

超声造影结合定量分析法诊断甲状腺微小乳头状癌的临床价值

  • 梁丽萍,任海波,郑艳芬,邬彩虹
作者信息 +

Clinical value of CEUS combined with quantitative analysis in the diagnosis of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma

  • LIANG Li-ping, REN Hai-bo, ZHENG Yan-fen, WU Cai-hong
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的:探讨超声造影(CEUS)结合定量分析法在诊断甲状腺微小乳头状癌(PTMC)中的价值。方法:回顾性分析63个甲状腺实性结节(直径≤10 mm)的超声造影增强特征,应用QLAB软件定量分析结节峰值强度(PI)、上升时间(RT)、平均通过时间(MTT)、曲线下面积(AUC)、浓度减半时间(TPH)、达峰时间(TTP)、上升斜率(WS)各定量参数,所有结节性质均经手术病理证实。结果:PTMC与甲状腺良性小结节的增强方式有差别(χ2=33.542,P=0.000),以早期低增强或低增强判断PTMC的敏感性、特异性分别为82.82%、79.40%。PTMC中PI低于其周围组织、甲状腺良性小结节及其周围组织,且差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。甲状腺良性小结节PI低于其周围组织,且差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。PTMC中AUC、TTP、WS均低于甲状腺良性小结节周围组织,且差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。其余各组数据比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。甲状腺定量分析参数PI诊断PTMC的敏感性、特异性分别为86.21%、88.23%。结论:PTMC以早期低增强或低增强为主要灌注模式。定量参数中以PI价值最大,可作为鉴别甲状腺良、恶性小结节的重要参考指标。甲状腺定量参数RT、MTT、AUC、TPH、TTP、WS对鉴别甲状腺良、恶性小结节价值不大。

Abstract

Objective: To explore the value of CEUS combined with quantitative analysis in the diagnosis of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma(PTMC). Methods: The CEUS features of 63 solid thyroid nodules(diameter≤10 mm) were retrospectively analyzed. The peak intensity(PI), the rise time(RT), the mean transit time(MTT), the area under the curve(AUC), the time from peak to one half(TPH), the time to peak(TTP), the wash in slope(WS) of nodules were quantitatively analyzed by QLAB software, all nodules were confirmed by surgery and pathology. Results: There was a difference between PTMC and benign small thyroid nodules in enhancement patterns(χ2=33.542, P=0.000). The sensitivity and specificity of early hypo-enhancement or hypo-enhancemen in the diagnosis of PTMC were 82.82% and 79.40% respectively. PI in PTMC was lower than that in tissues surrounding thyroid malignant nodules, benign small nodules of thyroid and tissues surrounding benign small nodules, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). The PI of thyroid benign nodules was lower than that of tissues surrounding the benign nodules, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). The AUC, TTP and WS of PTMC were lower than those of tissues surrounding the benign nodules(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in other groups(P>0.05). The sensitivity and specificity of PI in the diagnosis of PTMC were 86.21% and 88.23% respectively. Conclusion: The main perfusion mode of PTMC was early hypo- or hypo-enhancement. PI is the most valuable quantitative parameter of ROI, which can be used as an important reference index for differentiating benign and malignant thyroid nodules. Quantitative parameters such as RT, MTT, AUC, TPH, TTP and WS have little value in differentiating benign and malignant thyroid nodules.

关键词

甲状腺肿瘤 / / 乳头状 / 超声检查

Key words

Thyroid neoplasms / Carcinoma, papillary / Ultrasonography

引用本文

导出引用
梁丽萍,任海波,郑艳芬,邬彩虹. 超声造影结合定量分析法诊断甲状腺微小乳头状癌的临床价值[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志. 2019, 30(4): 253-256 https://doi.org/10.12117/jccmi.2019.04.007
LIANG Li-ping, REN Hai-bo, ZHENG Yan-fen, WU Cai-hong. Clinical value of CEUS combined with quantitative analysis in the diagnosis of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma[J]. Journal of China Clinic Medical Imaging. 2019, 30(4): 253-256 https://doi.org/10.12117/jccmi.2019.04.007
中图分类号: R736.1    R730.261    R445.1   

参考文献

[1]Ma JJ, Ding H, Xu BH, et al. Diagnostic performances of various gray-scale, color Doppler, and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography findings in predicting malignant thyroid nodules[J]. Thyroid, 2014, 24(2): 355-363. [2]张盛敏,陈立斌,许幼峰,等. 超声造影鉴别甲状腺良恶性结节的价值[J]. 全科医学临床与教育,2014,12(5):553-555. [3]陈超男,梁萍,程志刚,等. 超声造影在甲状腺结节良恶性鉴别中的临床应用[J]. 解放军医学院学报,2015,36(7):651-653. [4]李念芬,戚庭月,孙红光,等. 定量分析在不同超声造影特征甲状腺结节良恶性鉴别诊断中的价值[J]. 中国医疗设备,2017,32(12):87-90. [5]王明辉,马英路,崔广和,等. 细针穿刺细胞学检查和超声弹性成像及超声造影对甲状腺癌的诊断价值[J]. 中国超声医学杂志,2018,34(1):9-13. [6]刘晓红,张铁山,胡颖,等. 超声造影联合弹性成像技术诊断甲状腺微小癌的临床研究[J]. 中国实验诊断学,2015,19(9):1472-1474. [7]李小鹏,张红丽,何鑫,等. 甲状腺良恶性结节超声造影特征与病理微血管密度的相关性研究[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志,2015,26(9):631-634. [8]Hornung M, Jung EM, Georgieva M, et al. Detection of microvascularization of thyroid carcinomas using linear high resolution contrast-enhanced ultrasonography(CEUS)[J]. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc, 2012, 52(2): 197-203. [9]Zhang B, Jiang YX, Liu JB, et al. Utility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for evaluation of thyroid nodules[J]. Thyroid, 2010, 20(1): 51-57. [10]Li F, Luo H. Comparative study of thyroid puncture biopsy guided by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and conventional ultrasound[J]. Exp Ther Med, 2013, 5(5): 1381-1384. [11]马步云,金亚,赵海娜,等. 甲状腺乳头状癌的超声造影表现及其病理基础[J]. 四川大学学报:医学版,2014,45(6):997-1000. [12]温泉,罗渝昆,樊亚红,等. 超声造影定量分析鉴别甲状腺结节良恶性价值[J]. 解放军医学院学报,2015,36(5):415-418. [13]周琦,姜珏,杜晓鹏,等. 超声造影在甲状腺乳头状癌中的诊断价值[J]. 中国超声医学杂志,2011,27(7):595-597.

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/