肝脏低剂量迭代重建增强CT与常规增强CT图像质量及放射剂量的对比研究

徐 姝;侯 阳;郭启勇

中国临床医学影像杂志 ›› 2013, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (5) : 334-337.

中国临床医学影像杂志 ›› 2013, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (5) : 334-337.
论著

肝脏低剂量迭代重建增强CT与常规增强CT图像质量及放射剂量的对比研究

  • 徐 姝,侯 阳,郭启勇
作者信息 +

A comparative study of image quality and radiation dosage between iterative reconstruction algorithm oflow-dose scans and filtered back project routine-dose scans in hepatic enhanced CT

  • XU Shu, HOU Yang, GUO Qi-yong
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的:探讨iDOSE(iDOSE,Philips)技术降低肝脏肿瘤患者增强CT辐射剂量的能力。材料与方法:选择肝脏肿瘤患者200例进行常规及低剂量肝脏增强CT扫描。患者随机分成4组(A、B、C、D组),A组常规剂量扫描,滤波反投影(FBP)重建图像,B、C、D组增强扫描门脉期管电流分别较常规降低30%、50%、70%,iDOSE重建图像。定量计算4组图像噪声及对比噪声比(CNR)。对4组图像的诊断信息(肿瘤锐利度、肿瘤与正常肝脏组织对比度、图像主观噪声、图像总体质量)按1~4分(1分最差,4分最优)予以评分。采用完全随机设计的方差分析及秩和检验(Kruskal Wallis)对结果进行比较。结果:客观评估中,iDOSE重建各组的噪声均低于A组(P<0.01);CNR均高于A组(P<0.01)。主观评估中,4组图像之间肿瘤与正常肝脏组织对比度、主观噪声无差异(P=0.09,P=0.74);肿瘤锐利度及图像总体质量评估中B、C组与A组之间无差异,而D组低于A组(P<0.01)。结论:对于肝脏肿瘤患者增强CT检查,iDOSE迭代重建技术可使在管电流较常规剂量降低50%的条件下,仍得到与常规剂量FBP重建相当甚至更好的图像质量。

Abstract

Objective: To assess the ability of iDOSE(iDOSE, Philips) iterative reconstruction technique for low-dose hepatic enhanced CT. Materials and Methods: 200 patients with diagnosis of liver tumors were randomly divided into four groups(A, B, C, D). Patients in group A were scanned with routine-dose CT, reconstructed with filtered back projection(FBP). While patients in group B, C, D were scanned with 30%, 50% and 70% radiation dose reduction CT respectively, reconstructed with iDOSE reconstruction. Quantitative noise and contrast-to-noise(CNR) measurements were performed. Qualitative ranking of sharpness of tumors, contrast between tumors and normal liver tissue, noise, and image quality were graded(scale: 1(worse)-4(best)). Data was analyzed using completely randomized design analysis of variance and Kruskal Wallis test. Results: In the comparison of quantitative noise, the groups with iDOSE reconstruction were lower than group A(P<0.01). CNR of groups with iDOSE reconstruction were higher than group A(P<0.01). There was no significant difference among the four groups for tumor tissue contrast and qualitative noise score(P=0.09, P=0.74). There was no significant difference between group B and A, C and A for tumor sharpness and image quality scores. However, a significant difference in tumor sharpness and image quality scores was observed beween group D and group A(P<0.01). Conclusions: When the radiation dose of hepatic enhanced CT scan was reduced by 50%, images maintaining the diagnostic quality of routine dose CT or even better images could be acquired with iDOSE technique.

关键词

肝肿瘤 / 体层摄影术 / X线计算机

Key words

Liver neoplasms / Tomography / X-ray computed

引用本文

导出引用
徐 姝;侯 阳;郭启勇. 肝脏低剂量迭代重建增强CT与常规增强CT图像质量及放射剂量的对比研究[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志. 2013, 24(5): 334-337
XU Shu;HOU Yang;GUO Qi-yong. A comparative study of image quality and radiation dosage between iterative reconstruction algorithm oflow-dose scans and filtered back project routine-dose scans in hepatic enhanced CT[J]. Journal of China Clinic Medical Imaging. 2013, 24(5): 334-337
中图分类号: R735.7    R814.42   

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/