目的：探讨在儿童胸部CT检查过程中，患儿的呼吸频率与扫描螺距之间的关系并评价它们对图像质量和辐射剂量的影响。方法：将85例患儿随机分配到AB两组，再根据呼吸频率的不同将分别将AB两组患儿分别再分为A1、A2组和B1、B2组，A组患儿采用较大螺距进行扫描，B组患儿采用较小螺距进行扫描，记录患儿的CTDIvol以及DLP，并对患儿的CT图像质量进行客观及主观评价。结果：A组患儿的图像质量优于B组，特别是A1组患儿图像质量远优于B1组；A2和B2两组的患儿图像质量差异无统计学意义；A组患儿的平均DLP比B组患儿高18.5%，而CTDIvol差异无统计学意义。结论：儿童胸部CT检查时对于低频呼吸的患儿，采用小螺距扫描参数能够在保证图像质量的前提下，降低患儿的辐射剂量。
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the relationship between the respiratory rate and the scanning pitch when performing chest CT scan and evaluate their effect on image quality and radiation dose. Methods: Eighty-five patients were divided into group A and B randomly. According to their respiratory rate, patients in group A were divided into A1 and A2 group; patients in group B were divided into B1 and B2 group. In group A, high-pitch mode CT scan was performed; in group B, low-pitch mode CT scan was performed. The CTDIvol and DLP were recorded, and the image quality was evaluated subjectively and objectively. Results: Image quality of group A was better than that of group B; the difference was more obvious in A1 and B1 group; the CTDIvol was not significantly different in group A and group B, but the mean DLP value was 18.5% higher in group A than group B. Conclusion: Low-pitch mode CT scan was more suitable for low RRs patients when performing chest CT scan, that will reduce radiation dose while maintaining preferable image quality. Low-pitch mode CT scan was more suitable for low RRs patients when performing chest CT scan, which will reduce radiation dose while maintaining preferable image quality.
关键词
胸部疾病 /
儿童 /
体层摄影术 /
螺旋计算机
Key words
Thoracic diseases /
Child /
Tomography, spiral computed
中图分类号：
Ｒ655
R339.31
Ｒ814.42
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1]Bakhshi S, Radhakrishnan V, Sharma P, et al. Pediatric nonlymphoblastic non-Hodgkin lymphoma: baseline, interim, and post-treatment PET/CT versus contrast-enhanced CT for evaluation—a prospective study[J]. Radiology, 2012, 262(3): 956-968.
[2]Malviya S, Voepel-Lewis T, Eldevik OP, et al. Sedation and general anaesthesia in children undergoing MRI and CT: adverse events and outcomes[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2000, 84(6): 743-748.
[3]Deak PD, Langner O, Lell M, et al. Effects of adaptive section collimation on patient radiation dose in multisection spiral CT[J]. Radiology, 2009, 252(1): 140-147.
[4]Larson DB, Wang LL, Podberesky DJ, et al. System for verifiable CT radiation dose optimization based on image quality. Part Ⅰ. Optimization model[J]. Radiology, 2013, 269(1): 167-176.
[5]vander Molen AJ, Geleijns J. Overranging in multisection CT: quantification and relative contribution to dose-comparison of four 16-section CT scanner[J]. Radiology, 2007, 242(1): 208-216.
[6]Bastos MD, Lee EY, Strauss KJ, et al. Motion artifact on high-resolution CT images of pediatric patients: comparison of volumetric and axial CT methods[J]. AJR, 2009, 193(5): 1414-1418.
[7]Kelly DM, Hasegawa I, Borders R, et al. High-resolution CT using MDCT: comparison of degree of motion artifact between volumetric and axial methods[J]. AJR, 2012, 182(3): 757-759.
[8]曾宪春，陈静，王玉权，等. 超大螺距Turbo Flash扫描模式在学龄前儿童胸部检查中不用镇静剂的可行性[J]. 中国医学影像技术，2017，33（8）：1221-1225.
[9]田为中，张波，窦小峰，等. 双源CT大螺距螺旋扫描序列在无镇静儿童胸部CT平扫中的临床应用价值[J]. 中华放射学杂志，2014，48（3）：252-254.
[10]罗松，郑玲，张龙江，等. 超低剂量CTA研究专题·大螺距模式下智能最佳管电压调节结合迭代重建技术在CT胸主动脉成像中的图像质量和辐射剂量评价[J]. 放射学实践，2016，29（6）：597-600.
[11]Kim SH, Choi YH, Cho HH, et al. Comparison of image quality and radiation dose between high-pitch mode and low-pitch mode spiral chest CT in small uncooperative children: the effect of respiratory rate[J]. Eur Radiol, 2016, 26(4): 1149-1158.
[12]刘一，晏子旭，吴晓峰，等. 螺距的选择对胸腹主动脉夹层320层CT成像质量的影响[J]. 放射学实践，2011，26（3）：350-353.
[13]Lucaya J, Piqueras J, García-Pena P, et al. Low-dose high-resolution CT of the chest in children and young adults: dose, cooperation, artifact incidence, and image quality[J]. AJR, 2000, 175(4): 985-992.
[14]Gordic S, Desbiolles L, Sedlmair M, et al. Optimizing radiation dose by using advanced modelled iterative reconstruction in high-pitch coronary CT angiography[J]. Eur Radiol, 2016, 26(2): 459-468.
[15]袁肖娜，高知玲，马文东，等. 对比分析容积CT剂量指数与体型特异性的剂量评估在估算腹部CT扫描辐射剂量中的差异[J]． 中华放射医学与防护杂志，2016，36（1）：74-77.
